Last updated: 2026-06-26
Case-study issue
A hotel owner built a 14-property portfolio, with the two largest acquisitions each above $20 million. The operating skill was real, but the purchase agreements had a hidden tax problem: the seller's attorney controlled the allocation between land, building, tangible personal property, and other assets.
Years later, a state review challenged parts of the allocation. The result was a tax bill above $100,000, later negotiated down by more than half, plus a harder long-term problem: the corrected allocation reduced depreciable personal-property basis that had been supporting accelerated depreciation.
Why it matters
Acquisition planning is not only about price, cap rate, and financing. The contract and allocation can shape depreciation, sales tax, property tax, recapture, and future disposition choices for every year the owner holds the property.
Planning checks before closing
- Who is drafting the purchase agreement?
- Does the allocation serve the buyer's depreciation and basis position?
- Are tangible personal property, land, building, and other assets supported by defensible facts?
- Will the closing documents be usable for the CPA and any cost segregation review?
JPOPE planning lens
The right review happens before the contract terms are fixed. Once the allocation has flowed into depreciation schedules, future corrections can cost more than the planning would have.
